tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648350381471705812.post5392023660917239451..comments2023-04-28T05:18:57.401-07:00Comments on Confessions of a Creative Recruiter: Small TipAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05555253926154069343noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648350381471705812.post-89189964531731933802010-01-28T08:18:05.533-08:002010-01-28T08:18:05.533-08:00Thank you!Thank you!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648350381471705812.post-13807845378507500852010-01-26T13:40:25.985-08:002010-01-26T13:40:25.985-08:00Silence very well may be a test of your passion, a...Silence very well may be a test of your passion, although usually silence means the creative manager is crazy busy. <br />I feel for you. Especially after 5 months. Persistent is never too persistent if you are talented. It only becomes annoying if the candidate is not qualified (which you may never know if you are or aren't). I'd try one last time (via email) and ask the direct question "should I interpret not hearing from you as you not being interested in my talents?" You have nothing to lose and I would hope they'd take one second to finally reply.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05555253926154069343noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-648350381471705812.post-50702838598402822592010-01-26T12:19:04.173-08:002010-01-26T12:19:04.173-08:00That makes sense.
But, what should the candidate...That makes sense. <br /><br />But, what should the candidate do, if several ECD's recommend the creative manager to follow up with that candidate and the creative manger hasn’t had a chance to just yet?<br /><br />What if, this has been going on for 5 months of back and forth failed reconnections?<br /><br />How persistent is too persistent?<br /><br />Is the creative managers ‘silence’ a test of passion?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com